The unemployment rate, now hovering around 5%, has dropped a lot more quickly during the last three years than mainstream forecasters predicted. For example, back in February 2013, the Congressional Budget Office was forecasting that the unemployment rate would be 7.1% in 2015 and 6.3% in 2016. As another example, all participants in the meetings of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee present their forecast of economic conditions looking ahead. In the \”Summary of Economic Projections\” prepared for its December 2012 meeting, the predicted range for the unemployment rate in 2015 was 5.7% to 6.8%. To put it another way, the unemployment rate in the last three years has fallen by more than even the most optimistic member of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee believed was likely.
But now, the unemployment rate is close to bottoming out. The Congressional Budget Office forecast for January 2016 is that the unemployment rate will fall to 4.5% in 2016 and 2017, but will then rise back to 5.0% in the long run. In the Federal Reserve\’s \”Summary of Economic Projections\” for its meeting of December 16, 2015, the median prediction is that unemployment will fall to 4.7% for the next three years from 2016 to 2018 but in the long run will rise back to 4.9%.
In short, while the unemployment rate may dip a bit lower or bounce a bit higher, the long fall in the unemployment rate from its peak of 10% in October 2009 is mostly finished. So what\’s the next step in looking for whether the labor market continues to improve? There are two broad metrics that come to mind. Are wages starting to rise more quickly, as one would expect in a tighter labor market? and what\’s the share of Americans who have jobs?
There are some early and very preliminary signs that wages might finally be starting to rise. For example, here\’s a figure from the \”US Economy in a Snapshot\” published earlier in January 2016 by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Of course, what actually matters is not just wages, but whether wages are keeping ahead of inflation. Here\’s a figure in which the blue line shows the Employment Cost Index, a broad measure of how much costs of compensation (including benefits) are rising. The red line shows the rate of inflation based on the Personal Consumption Expenditures index. Notice that back around 2003-2004, compensation increases were running above inflation. The rate of inflation leaps up and down, in part driven by short-term shifts in prices of oil and food, but you can see that compensation wasn\’t running much ahead of inflation–if at all–from when the recession got underway up through about 2012. However, just in the last year or so, compensation has again been ahead of inflation
Another labor market measure that deserves a close look moving ahead is the relationship between the unemployment rate and some broader measures of labor market involvement. In this figure, again taken from the \”US Economy in a Snapshot,\” the blue line shows the unemployment rate rising during the recession and falling again. The red line shows the labor force participation rate, which I\’ve written on this blog a number of times. The beige line shows the employment/population ratio
The downward trend in the labor force participation rate started well before the recession, and as I\’ve discussed on this website before (for example, here and here), the long-term trend reflects factors like young adults being more likely to attend school, low-wage workers having fewer job opportunities, and the baby boom generation reaching retirement age. This long-term fall in the labor force participation rate accelerates during the Great Recession, but more recently, it the rate of decline has slowed again.
A pattern I haven\’t written about much on this blog is the employment-to-population ratio, which has declined over time for many of the same reasons as the labor force participation rate. The economic concept of the \”labor force\” includes both the employed and the unemployed–that is, everyone who has a job or is actively looking for one. However, the employment/population ratio includes only the employed,which is why it drops more sharply during recessions. It\’s interesting that the employment/population ratio actually stabilized back around 2010 and has even increased a little since then.
Maybe it goes without saying, but just because unemployment is bottoming out doesn\’t mean that everything is hunky-dory for everyone in the labor market. But the labor market problems of having the unemployment rate at 5% is at least a different and less terrible than the problems of having an unemployment rate at 10%.